Sunday, September 17, 2017

The Exorcist

I never used to watch any horror films except for the old monster movies until The Elder Son decided I needed to broaden my film horizons. I started watching ones he suggested and looking at top-10 and best-of lists, and I've liked much of what I've seen. I'm still don't like torture porn and slasher movies, but now I have experience to back my opinion. Somehow, though, I never got around to seeing The Exorcist. Seeing it this long after its release takes the edge off of the effect, I'm sure, but I'm still glad I've seen it.

The movie stars Ellen Burstyn, Max von Sydow, Lee J. Cobb, Jack MacGowran, and Linda Blair.

trailer:



Deep Focus Review has a lengthy article which includes this: "The film opened to largely positive reviews, many declaring it a benchmark of horror filmmaking. Its detractors voiced their negative assessments even louder, however, as the potent subject matter seemed to enrage certain sensibilities" and concludes,
How else but through the film’s profound spirituality—achieved via the combination of shocking visuals, the dismissal of other explanations (i.e. medical or psychiatric), and the terrifying reality of the horrors of evil—does one explain such extreme responses over the years? The Exorcist continues to affect audiences, transcending what it means to be “a horror film” through its unparalleled construction, and the balance of visceral imagery designating the resonant emotional and spiritual questions therein. Other filmmakers have attempted to out-do Friedkin’s work, but the horror genre almost never allows for the degree of insight or good intentions that is accomplished through such graphic content. The Exorcist realizes a unique stability between image and substance that audiences cannot disregard, and which has established the picture as an indisputable classic of its genre.
Rolling Stone gives it 4 out of 4 stars. Empire Online concludes, "Fans should see it again, first-timers should believe the hype. Non-believers should suffer eternal damnation." Roger Ebert gives it 4 stars. Rotten Tomatoes has a critics score of 86%.

6 comments:

  1. I've never seen the Exorcist, but I heard it was gory. I'm glad you cleared that up for me. Thanks for reviewing it, because I suspect you are right, that the film is so dated, and there are so many advancements in computer graphics, it is probably tame by today's standards. Thanks for reviewing it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I found it affecting in its handling of the religious aspects, but the special effects would've definitely put me off back in the day. Now, not so much.

      Delete
  2. I've never seen this film. I'm not really a horror film girl, but this one is such a classic I do need to watch it. Thanks for the review! And happy weekend! Hugs-Erika

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That sounds exactly like me! I am mainly interested in filling in my classics-watching, but I've found some of the sub-genres (like ghost stories and ones that focus on mental health issues and horror westerns) that I seek out for their own sake now.

      It's been a gorgeous week-end here! Highs in the upper 80s and sunny :) Fall has already taken a break, it seems lol

      Delete
  3. Saw this back when it was new, but the book was much scarier to me. The movie made me laugh in many parts (the pea soup and flying bed and head spinning), but they did a fair job with the story. Have a great week. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've never read the book. I was shocked when I heard they got the story idea from a real boy's situation.

      Delete