trailer:
Slant Magazine concludes,
An unequivocal success upon its 1935 release, Frank Lloyd's big, astute spectacle can now be seen as a Swiss clock-type example of screenplay structure and a showcase for adventure unencumbered by beasts, blood, or much romance.FilmSite calls it "one of the best nautical adventure films of all time and one of MGM's greatest classics." DVD Talk has a positive review. Rotten Tomatoes has a critics score of 94%.
One of my favorite's. Charles Laughton is great as Bligh, but I liked Marlon Brando as Fletcher Christian in the 1962 version better. Too bad Laughton and Brando couldn't have been the pairing.
ReplyDeleteYes, now that would've been perfect!
DeleteI first saw the laughing and thought you didn't like it. Then I realized it was from the old film preview reel. This is usually a good tale to watch. I remember the one with Anthony Hopkins I think back from the 80's or 990's. Happy Saturday. Hugs-Erika
ReplyDeleteIt seems sea-faring tales are popular these days, so maybe we'll see more of these oldies on TV :)
DeleteI've heard of this, but never seen it. Not sure it's my cup of tea, though.
ReplyDeleteMy husband is a fan of adventure tales and swashbucklers, so I see a lot of them I might not otherwise watch. This story has been re-told time and again.
DeleteI saw this one, one with Clark Gable, and one with Anthony Hopkins. They must be about due for another remake--LOL! ;)
ReplyDelete1933 with Errol Flynn;
Delete1935 with Laughton/Gable;
1962 with Trevor Howard/Marlon Brando;
1984 with Anthony Hopkins/Mel Gibson;
so, yes, we're definitely due for a re-evaluation of the event and a new story lol! Who would star? Especially if we see a rehab of Bligh.
Oh, I've seen the one with Brando, too! Not sure about the Errol Flynn one, though.
DeleteOnly reason I watched the last one--I'd watch anything with Anthony Hopkins in it. ;)
It's called "In the Wake of the Bounty" and was Flynn's debut film. It's just over an hour long and is online, including here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nEr85BV3Ro It uses documentary footage and re-enactments and focuses on the aftermath. A different kinda thing than the others. I've got it running as I write this, and I don't think I've ever seen it except for random clips.
DeleteI've seen this one several times, it was one of the fave films of my late husband. Have a great day, Valerie
ReplyDeleteI think it earned its place in that book 1,000 Movies You Must See Before You Die.
Delete