trailer:
Slant Magazine gives it 4 out of 4 stars and says, "It’s a film that’s many things to many people, from camp spectacular to revisionist genre epic, and nearly every reading seems viable. Was it Nicholas Ray’s intention to subvert every expectation, to undermine the conventions of the most American of genres? "
The Guardian calls it an "unforgettably strange, brilliant western". IndieWire concludes, "Ray made a completely over the top film that evokes the gender inequality, witch hunt sensibility and civic timidity within the mid-50’s culture that produced it more memorably than any other western movie of its era." The New Yorker calls it "miraculous" and says, "Nicholas Ray is Hollywood’s most emotionally furious, extreme, and sensitive director, and, in a career of eliciting uniquely impassioned performances, those he coaxes from Joan Crawford and Sterling Hayden are two of the greatest he ever got—therefore, two of the best ever recorded on film."
Roger Ebert counts it as a "Great Movie" and says it
is surely one of the most blatant psychosexual melodramas ever to disguise itself in that most commodious of genres, the Western. ... A cheap Western from Republic Pictures, yes. And also one of the boldest and most stylized films of its time, quirky, political, twisted. ... The dynamic of their investigation and their attempts to force townsfolk to testify against one another form an allegory squarely aimed at the House Un-American Activities Committee, which in 1954 was trying to force alleged communists to "name names" of other alleged communistsTime Out gives it 5 out of 5 stars, calling it a "heady, Freudian western masterpiece" and "a rip-snorting yarn". 95% of Rotten Tomatoes critics gave it positive reviews.
I'm still amazed how you find so many old movies. I chuckled at The Guardian's description .. "unforgettably strange, brilliant western."
ReplyDeleteI go through many lists ;)
Delete...another one that I don't remember, but I was only 8 years old at the time.
ReplyDeleteThis was my first time to see it. I didn't see anything when it first came out lol
DeleteThe producers forgot to include Bette Davis
ReplyDeleteAnd we're the better for it ;)
DeleteI haven't seen this in a while and seem to remember it being quite an unusual western 😉. Wishing you a wonderful new week! Hugs, Jo x
ReplyDeleteYes, the focus on these powerful women made it quite unusual.
DeleteI don't think I have ever heard of this film, but it has a great name. I should check it out as I take it it is on Prime? Happy new week. Hugs-Erika
ReplyDeleteYes, it looks like it's still on Prime. It's on Hulu, too, but we don't have that service.
DeleteI'm not a western Fan. Valerie
ReplyDeleteThis ain't your typical western.
DeleteNot much of a fan of Joan Crawford but I put it in my watchlist. I do like Sterling Hayden. With the unusual storyline I doubt this was ever played for the Saturday matinee Westerns in Minneapolis when I was a kid. Didn't look familiar. A woman getting hung would have been so strange back then that I would think I would remember that...and that she got away. ;)
ReplyDeleteI'm like you. I watched this in spite of rather than because of Crawford ;) Yes, this one is quite unusual. More a drama than a typical western film.
Delete