The New York Times has a mixed review from the time of the film's release. Variety says, "The dramatics are heavy but so skillfully handled that they never cloy." Slant Magazine gives it 3 out of 4 stars calls it an "intense melodrama" and says, "Though all of its craft is accomplished, Mildred Pierce never gets deep under one’s skin the way it ought to."
Empire Online concludes with this:
Wow! It may not be art or good taste, but throbbing melodrama doesn't come with more conviction. Even to those usually turned off by the tough Crawford, Mildred is compelling.Filmsite.org has an extensive plot description and describes it as "a classic, post-war film noir mixed with typical soap-operish elements of the woman's melodramatic picture or "weeper," including a strand of a typical murder mystery". BBC gives it 4 out of 5 stars and praises Joan Crawford. Rotten Tomatoes has a critics rating of 83%.
Yes, all that self-sacrifice wears on a person, but I also watched the remake--LOL! ;)
ReplyDeleteThere was a remake? lol It doesn't surprise me, since tv and movies seem to prefer re-making old material than coming up with something original :(
DeleteYes, a miniseries with Kate Winslet just a few years ago. I liked it a little better than the original but then I never cared for Joan Crawford long before Mommy Dearest came out. ;)
DeleteI wish we could get some new ideas instead of so many re-makes :(
DeleteI will watch it - seems interesting! Happy Sunday!
ReplyDeleteI hope you like it. It gets good reviews :)
DeleteNot a big fan of Joan Crawford, but Michael Curtiz generally is a top shelf director.
ReplyDeleteI'm with you there, on both counts.
DeleteNot familiar with this one, Michael Curtiz is a legend though 😁. I hope you had a wonderful weekend and enjoy your week! J 😊 x
ReplyDeleteHe is indeed. This melodrama just got to be too much for me...
Delete